Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs NVIDIA GeForce 820M

Description

This is a comprehensive analysis comparing the Intel UHD Graphics P750 on one side and NVIDIA GeForce 820M on the other side.

The first video card was released on 2021. This GPU is equipped with System Shared of System Shared memory, with a bandwidth of System Dependent. The architecture of this card: base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 900 MHz, TDP of this video card is 15 W.

The second video card was released on Nov 27th, 2013 and comes with 1 GB of DDR3 memory, with a bandwidth of 14.40 GB/s. This GPU also has a base clock of and a boost clock of , and it has a TDP of 15 W.

This table also comprises board specifications, pixel and texture filtration, launch price, and benchmarks such as G3DMark, PassMark G2D, 3DMark Firestrike, FPS, and Hashrate.

Key Differences

Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics P750:

  • Intel UHD Graphics P750 is newer: launch date is 2021.
  • Passmark G3DMark is 70.52%: higher: 1730 vs 510.
  • Passmark PassMark G2D is 74.21%: higher: 442 vs 114.
  • Up to 94.79% higher in FLOPS: 460.8 GFLOPS vs 240 GFLOPS.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 820M:

  • Consumes less energy: 15 W vs 15 W.

Technical specifications

Intel UHD Graphics P750 NVIDIA GeForce 820M
Graphics Processor
GPU Name: Intel UHD Graphics P750 NVIDIA GeForce 820M
GPU Variant: - N15V-GM-B-A2
Processor: Generation 12.1 Fermi 2.0
Foundry: Intel TSMC
Technology: 14 nm+++ 28 nm
Transistors: unknown 585 million
Die Size: unknown 116 mm²
General information
Release Date: 2021 Nov 27th, 2013
Availability: - -
Generation: HD Graphics-W (Rocket Lake) GeForce 800M
Predecessor: - GeForce 700M
Successor: - GeForce 900M
Production: Active End-of-life
Launch Price: - -
Current Price: - -
Bus Interface: Ring Bus PCIe 2.0 x16
Reviews: 2 in our database -
Clock Speeds
Base Clock Speed: 300 MHz -
Boost Clock Speed: 900 MHz -
SOC clock: - -
UVD clock: - -
Memory Clock: System Shared 900 MHz 1800 Mbps effective
Memory specs
RAM: System Shared 1 GB
Type of memory: System Shared DDR3
Memory Bus: System Shared 64 bit
Memory Bandwidth: System Dependent 14.40 GB/s
Render Config
Shading Units: 256 96
TMUs: 64 16
ROPs: 32 8
Compute units: - -
Tensor Cores: - -
RT Cores: - -
L0 Cache: - -
L1 Cache: - 64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache: - 128 KB
L3 Cache: - -
Board specs
Slot Width: IGP -
Length: - -
Width: - -
Height: - -
TDP: 15 W 15 W
Suggested PSU: - -
Outputs: No outputs No outputs
Power Connectors: - -
Part Number: - -
Board Number: - -
Technology Support
DirectX: 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
OpenGL: 4.6 4.6
OpenCL: - 2347
Vulkan: - -
CUDA: - -
Shader Model: - -

Theoretical Performance

Pixel Fillrate:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
28.8 GPixel/s
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
2.5 GPixel/s
Texture Fillrate:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
57.6 GTexel/s
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
10 GTexel/s
FP16 (half):
Intel UHD Graphics P750
921.6 GFLOPS (2:1)
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
FP32 (float):
Intel UHD Graphics P750
460.8 GFLOPS
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
240 GFLOPS
FP64 (double):
Intel UHD Graphics P750
115.2 GFLOPS (1:4)
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
20 GFLOPS (1:12)
Unified Shaders:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
256
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
384
Texture Mapping Units:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
64
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
32
Render Output Units:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
32
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
16

Benchmarks Performance Tests

Passmark (G3D):
Intel UHD Graphics P750
1730
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
510
PassMark (G2D):
Intel UHD Graphics P750
442
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
114
3DMark (Fire Strike):
Intel UHD Graphics P750
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
847
OpenCL:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
No data
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
2347
Power Performance:
Intel UHD Graphics P750
No data
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
34.04

Gaming performance benchmarks comparison

Game
Frames per second (avg)
Counter-Strike: GO
Intel UHD Graphics P750
No data
NVIDIA GeForce 820M
106.5

Popular comparisons

compares icon
Compare