Intel Iris Graphics 6100 vs Intel GMA X3000

Description

This is a comprehensive analysis comparing the Intel Iris Graphics 6100 on one side and Intel GMA X3000 on the other side.

The first video card was released on Sep 5th, 2014. This GPU is equipped with System Shared of System Shared memory, with a bandwidth of System Dependent. The architecture of this card: base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz, TDP of this video card is 15 W.

The second video card was released on Jun 1st, 2006 and comes with System Shared of System Shared memory, with a bandwidth of System Dependent. This GPU also has a base clock of and a boost clock of , and it has a TDP of 13 W.

This table also comprises board specifications, pixel and texture filtration, launch price, and benchmarks such as G3DMark, PassMark G2D, 3DMark Firestrike, FPS, and Hashrate.

Key Differences

Advantages of Intel Iris Graphics 6100:

  • Intel Iris Graphics 6100 is newer: launch date is Sep 5th, 2014.

Advantages of Intel GMA X3000:

  • Consumes less energy: 13 W vs 15 W.

Technical specifications

Intel Iris Graphics 6100 Intel GMA X3000
Graphics Processor
GPU Name: Intel Iris Graphics 6100 Intel GMA X3000
GPU Variant: - Broadwater-G (Q965)
Processor: Generation 8.0 Generation 4.0
Foundry: Intel Intel
Technology: 14 nm 90 nm
Transistors: unknown unknown
Die Size: 133 mm² unknown
General information
Release Date: Sep 5th, 2014 Jun 1st, 2006
Availability: - -
Generation: HD Graphics-M (Broadwell) GMA Graphics (GMA 3000 IGP)
Predecessor: - -
Successor: - -
Production: End-of-life End-of-life
Launch Price: - -
Current Price: - -
Bus Interface: Ring Bus FSB
Reviews: 2 in our database 2 in our database
Clock Speeds
Base Clock Speed: 300 MHz -
Boost Clock Speed: 1000 MHz -
SOC clock: - -
UVD clock: - -
Memory Clock: System Shared System Shared
Memory specs
RAM: System Shared System Shared
Type of memory: System Shared System Shared
Memory Bus: System Shared System Shared
Memory Bandwidth: System Dependent System Dependent
Render Config
Shading Units: 384 -
TMUs: 48 4
ROPs: 6 4
Compute units: - -
Tensor Cores: - -
RT Cores: - -
L0 Cache: - -
L1 Cache: - -
L2 Cache: - -
L3 Cache: - -
Board specs
Slot Width: IGP IGP
Length: - -
Width: - -
Height: - -
TDP: 15 W 13 W
Suggested PSU: - -
Outputs: No outputs No outputs
Power Connectors: None -
Part Number: - -
Board Number: - -
Technology Support
DirectX: 12 (11_1) 9.0c
OpenGL: 4.4 2.0
OpenCL: 3909 -
Vulkan: - -
CUDA: - -
Shader Model: - -

Theoretical Performance

Pixel Fillrate:
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
6 GPixel/s
Intel GMA X3000
2.668 GPixel/s
Texture Fillrate:
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
48 GTexel/s
Intel GMA X3000
2.668 GTexel/s
FP32 (float):
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
768 GFLOPS
Intel GMA X3000
FP64 (double):
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
192 GFLOPS (1:4)
Intel GMA X3000
Unified Shaders:
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
384
Intel GMA X3000
No data
Texture Mapping Units:
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
48
Intel GMA X3000
4
Render Output Units:
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
6
Intel GMA X3000
4
Pixel Shaders:
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
No data
Intel GMA X3000
4
Vertex Shaders:
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
No data
Intel GMA X3000
1

Benchmarks Performance Tests

Passmark (G3D):
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
907
Intel GMA X3000
No data
PassMark (G2D):
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
319
Intel GMA X3000
No data
3DMark (Ice Storm):
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
87578
Intel GMA X3000
No data
OpenCL:
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
3909
Intel GMA X3000
No data
METAL:
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
457
Intel GMA X3000
No data

Gaming performance benchmarks comparison

Game
Frames per second (avg)
Counter-Strike: GO
Intel Iris Graphics 6100
85.57
Intel GMA X3000
No data

Popular comparisons

compares icon
Compare